Are “Services” Lienable If They Relate To Something That Is Not An “Improvement”?
Whether something put on land is an “improvement” for the purposes of construction and builders’ liens can be a difficult question of fact and law.
Whether something put on land is an “improvement” for the purposes of construction and builders’ liens can be a difficult question of fact and law.
The Saskatchewan Queen’s Bench recently considered the definition of the word “improvement” in the Builders’ Lien Act of Saskatchewan. In Propak Systems Ltd. v. Grey
In my article dated December 11, 2011, I reported on a decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court holding that demolition is not an “improvement”
Update: The decision of the BC Supreme Court in West Fraser Mills Ltd. v. BKB Construction Inc., referred to in this article has since been
January 2011 Construction Lien Act – Improvement: The Ontario Construction Lien Act has been recently amended to broaden the definition of “improvement”. That definition now